Most and Least of Research Value/s

Authors

  • Christian Ulrik Andersen Aarhus University
  • Geoff Cox London South Bank University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/aprja.v7i1.115055

Abstract

There is value and there are values. There is the measure of wealth, metrified and calculated in numerous ways, and there are ideas, ethics, preferences of taste, and customs of ideology. That the two can be associated together is nothing new. It is easy to value values and quantify how well we like, prefer or perform values (on a scale from one to ten; and ironicized here in the reworking of this introduction by Pip Thornton). Likewise, such processes of valorization in themselves imply particular values, ideologies and ethi- cal or aesthetical preferences (the beauty and rightfulness of valorization, wealth and surplus). But what really happens when the two are conflated? How do we understand how the values associated with something give it value; or, how giving something a value affords certain values? And, in what ways are the conflations of value and values tied to the circulation of value and values in contemporary technical infrastructures?

Author Biographies

Christian Ulrik Andersen, Aarhus University

Christian Ulrik Andersen is associate professor at the Dept. of Digital Design & Information Studies, Aarhus University, Research Fellow at the Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (2023-25), and founding member of Digital Aesthetics Research Center.

Geoff Cox, London South Bank University

Geoff Cox is Professor of Art and Computational Culture at London South Bank University, Director of Digital & Data Research Centre, and co-Director of Centre for the Study of the Networked Image.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-06